seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 14:23 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> I'd argue that the rpm feature can be enabled asap/now (since, afaik, >> nothing uses it), then the technical details and policy can be hammered >> out, but that's just me. (: > Right b/c you won't be receiving the "why don't yum and anaconda support > suggests/enhances" bug reports for ALL of the fc6 cycle. > > No thank you. No one is suggesting (esp not me) that this is be for fc6. Sorry, I guess my comment saying now/asap might imply that. It's definitely post fc6 (fc7+) territory. -- Rex _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
