seth vidal wrote: > And as I said before - the 'soft requires' need to have a lot of policy > decided on before we throw them into the tree. Not only for kickstart > but also for yum and policy for how things like 'enhances' will be > moderated in extras. > Doing it willy-nilly is a path to pain. I'd argue that the rpm feature can be enabled asap/now (since, afaik, nothing uses it), then the technical details and policy can be hammered out, but that's just me. (: Regardless, I'll try to push this topic in the packaging comittee to at least try to lay some groundwork on the policy end of things. -- Rex _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly