On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 12:46 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 07 July 2006 17:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > > Summary: RPM 4.4.6 is available > > > Ugh. Ugh indeed. But I take the other position--why is there no explanation from the Red Hat side as to why we're not following upstream? I think this is a case of "lead, follow, or get out of the way", and by taking no proactive position on the subject, we're being asked to follow or get out of the way. If we put a clear explanation why we're not following upstream, at least people would know where we stand and why. M _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
