On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > One problem we've been trying to tackle is providing > infrastructure(*) > for Fedora (sub)Projects. So, is 108 appropriate for this? > > (*) project space, mailing lists, etc... The problem currently is that 108 is comprised of some closed source bits. From a Fedora Project standpoint thats a non-starter. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
