Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
One problem we've been trying to tackle is providing
infrastructure(*)
for Fedora (sub)Projects. So, is 108 appropriate for this?
(*) project space, mailing lists, etc...
The problem currently is that 108 is comprised of some closed source
bits. From a Fedora Project standpoint thats a non-starter.
The pragmatist in me is getting frustrated, because that means nothing
will get done, at least not without a lot more time/effort re-inventing
an opensource wheel. ):
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
