On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 13:33 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > One problem we've been trying to tackle is providing > > infrastructure(*) > > for Fedora (sub)Projects. So, is 108 appropriate for this? > > > > (*) project space, mailing lists, etc... > > The problem currently is that 108 is comprised of some closed source > bits. From a Fedora Project standpoint thats a non-starter. > So when Karsten said it will be open-sourced he meant "not opensourced"? :) -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
