Re: Fedora as Free Software?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/13/06, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

>     Ok here is what is out of Fedora development this morning.. hoping

> Is it worth filing bugs against the 200+ packages that need a cleanup?

I'd suggest waiting at least until a license format standard/guideline
is chosen.


Yeah.. Not having those would be a waste of time. When they are
finalized.. I could just send in Patches for all the packages after
making sure that the license lines are true.

> And who would formulate a standard Licensing schema for this? [Again is
> it worth it.. beyond pub arguments?]

I'd argue this should fall under Fedora Packaging Guidelines.


If I can be of help here.. ping me. Otherwise I will just get out of
the way until I can be of use.



--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux