> I'm wondering what you guys think about changing the tilt of Fedora from > open source to free software. Namely, saying that the license should > meet the free software definition ( > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html ) and then mentioning that > OSI-certified licenses (with the exception of the Reciprocal Public > License, which we're going to reevaluate) are a good list, as well as > the free software licenses that are listed on the FSF website. > > The goal is to make Fedora a distribution that the FSF can positively > endorse. I think we're really close. Any reason to not try to go all > the way? Do we have an idea of what we would need to drop to be completely free software definition compliant? What would we lose? I guess a few rpm queries on license should work. what licenses are we looking for? -sv