On Tuesday 23 May 2006 10:00, "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmmm, Mark Webbink should probably give us a quick law lesson if he > has the chance. > > I remember getting a quick lesson years ago by another RH counsel > about licensing.. but I have slept a lot since then, and I could be > stickign 20 things together in the wrong order. What I recall is that > there are some issues about referencing draft documents in a licensing > deal unless the items are labeled correctly and that both items have > a clause saying that the party righting the license has the right to > change the license without notification (and party B is bound by those > changes). If not someone who licenses there stuff under a broken draft > can use it and not be covered under any fixes. There aren't any drafts in the actual legal specifications. Chitlesh was pointing to a draft FAQ about Fedora Documentation licensing. The FAQ is not an actual legal reference. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpeJSvQNnQnd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
