Re: Installing RHEL 2 (yes, "*2*") inside a F9 KVM VM...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:21:58PM -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> 
> I'm not passing down variant now for virtinst API calls (but can 
> probably do this in a future
> release if the user supplies it). Is there a suggestion to just make it 
> default to the compatible NIC that would
> be good for all Fedora/RHEL (or are there performance issues in doing 
> this or something)?

That's the situation we've got already - we compile Xen and  KVM to use
the rtl8139 nic since that's the best lowest-common denominator. It was
a barely passable approach so far, but with VirtIO it is now past its sell
by date and we have to key off os type/variant. If we don't then we'll
be limiting guests to 1/100 of the their potential performance. Not cool


Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux