Sandor W. Sklar wrote:
On May 2, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
Still, more feedback welcome... as I'm curious as to how widely this
is being used (and also how
high dnsmasq is scaling)
Since you said more feedback is welcome, I'll state that we in fact do
not use any of the DNS features of cobbler; we've already got a
large-scale, robust DNS service and management system, so, vis-a-vis
this thread, I just hope that whatever decision is made, it doesn't
have too much impact on those of us not using Cobbler for DNS.
Thanks,
-s-
It will not make any impact. Mainly I just needed feedback on dnsmasq. I
know quite a few people are using the ISC support.
The idea with Cobbler is that if you /do/ want to get out of the
business of maintaining your DHCP/DNS/kickstart/system-definition info
in 3 places, cobbler will let you do it. And while it is "batteries
included", we don't require any of those to be used, nor are they on by
default.
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
