Am 24.05.22 um 19:53 schrieb Maxwell G via epel-devel:
On Monday, May 23, 2022 11:18:38 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've been coming to the thinking that naming the SRPMS
python3X-%{srcname}-epel is a better choice. This makes modifying
original Fedora specs simpler.
I think that makes sense, especially considering that these packages will not
be built for Fedora.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Python3X
Here is some feedback:
First, aren't we trying to move off the wiki? Wouldn't this be a better
candidate for the EPEL docs on docs.fp.o?
separate Python 3 minor versions in EPEL 8 are packaged as separate python3X
(currently python38) packages to allow for independent versions for each
Python version.
There is also python39.
Just a followup:
In CS8/EPELNEXT ansible is on following version now:
# rpm -qa |grep ansible
ansible-core-2.13.3-1.el8.x86_64
ansible-6.0.0-1.el8.next.noarch
with following dependency
# rpm -q --requires ansible-core |grep abi
python(abi) = 3.9
so the mentioned passlib package needs the corresponding rebuild:
I quick test in COPR shows - while builded against the
corresponding python "dnf" module, it necessary don't need to be
in a stream/module itself. All variants can be installed side by side:
# rpm -qa |grep passlib
python3-passlib-1.7.4-6.el8.noarch
python38-passlib-1.7.4-6.el8.noarch
python39-passlib-1.7.4-8.el8.noarch
It seems that the fedora maintainer had changed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087268
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
