On 5/17/22 12:05, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
Am 17.05.22 um 18:08 schrieb Maxwell G:On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:58:33 AM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:https://paste.centos.org/view/06187bdb adaptshttps://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-passlib/blob/main/f/python-passlib.specto build it locally (for the sake of progress I disabled the tests/nose dep).Unless you are planning to remove python3-passlib (the python36 version) or make it a modular package, I think it is better to just create a new SRPM named python38-passlib with no subpackages.https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087268
I've been coming to the thinking that naming the SRPMS python3X-%{srcname}-epel is a better choice. This makes modifying original Fedora specs simpler. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Python3X
PS: Is it only my impression or do others feel also the same. Starting with EL8 the expenses just for the platform (distribution) gets more and more attention in our daily work. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Yes, I seem to be staring down a huge amount of work to package up python 3.8 deps for EPEL8. I suppose I should just give up and start using pip and virtual envs.
-- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
