On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:59 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm a bit confused here... you seem to be conflating epel and this > epel-stream/epel-next. Do you mean both of them? Yeah, I'm thinking both. From a high level, I don't see them as being distinct, just different targets for the same idea. Of course, that doesn't mean there aren't lower-level issues that would make it hard or impossible. It's also possible that I'm just totally wrong; I've been a little under quota on that lately, so I'm due. :-) > would move over? We would need at least shared git (is that still > something that might happen someday?) > "In the fullness of time", as they say, that's something that might happen. Is that before the heat death of the universe? I can't say. I won't continue distracting the thread with this idea for now, I just tossed it out as an idle thought. But the naming suggestions are sincere. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
