On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > To solve this problem, I am proposing that we create a new repository called > EPEL 8 Next. > > - built against CentOS 8 Stream > - opt-in for packagers (must request epel8-next dist-git branch) > - opt-in for users (part of epel-release but disabled by default) > - used *with* epel8, not *instead of* > I agree with all of that. I only don't like the name. Why EPEL 8 Next? If it is to be use with Stream, why don't we call it EPEL 8 Stream? I think the meaning of the repository would be easier to understand. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
