On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:36:44PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: ...snip... > Warning: heresy and rampant speculation ahead! > It's too early to do this now, but I think there's a compelling case > to be made for shifting EPEL from Fedora to Stream at some point. This > would be dependent on getting a solid contributor community > established for Stream, of course. Realistically, I'd say we're a few > years away from making that transition, but I think the Stream > community would be a more natural fit. If CentOS Stream had existed > when EPEL started, I don't think we'd have made EPEL a part of Fedora, > despite the good points Matthew makes below. (In other words, it's not > a foregone conclusion that EPEL should be a part of Stream, and there > are reasons not to do that, but there are also reasons to do that. > That's a problem for Future Us to solve.) I'm a bit confused here... you seem to be conflating epel and this epel-stream/epel-next. Do you mean both of them? or just the new one would move over? We would need at least shared git (is that still something that might happen someday?) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
