Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> said: > Does this mean if there's a package foo that is a rhel package, but not > in a module, that it can be overlapped with a foo package thats in a > epel non default module? ie, does it only mean the modular case or does > it mean any rpm? As a consumer of EPEL, I'd rather nothing in the base RHEL (or really CentOS in my case) ever get replaced, up or downgrade, by something in EPEL. Unless... does RHEL have modules that replace base packages? I admit, I haven't fully got my head wrapped around all the effects of modularity. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
