Re: Proposed official change to EPEL guidelines: modules and RHEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:54:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I've been saying this for a while as if it's fact, but of course it's not
> actually fact until approved, so I'm puting this to the EPEL team to
> hopefully do so.
> 
> The current guidelines * say:
> 
>    EPEL packages should only enhance and never disturb the Enterprise Linux
>    distributions they were built for. Thus packages from EPEL should never
>    replace packages from the target base distribution - including those on the
>    base distribution as well as layered products; kernel-modules further are
>    not allowed, as they can disturb the base kernel easily.
> 
> With modularity in EPEL 8, we have the opportunity to allow more flexibility
> while preserving the primary goal of not disturbing the base distribution.
> Therefore, I propose adding:
> 
>   In EPEL 8 or later, it is permitted to have module streams which contain
>   packages with alternate versions to those provided in RHEL. These packages
>   may be newer, built with different options, or even older to serve
>   compatibility needs. These MUST NOT be the default stream -- in every
>   case, explicit user action must be required to opt in to these versions.
> 
> 
> (Note that the base package _does not_ have to be part of a module for this
> to work.)
> 
> What do you think?

This is what I was trying to get to in the thread recently about
libssh2. However it's still not entirely clear to me. 

Does this mean if there's a package foo that is a rhel package, but not
in a module, that it can be overlapped with a foo package thats in a
epel non default module? ie, does it only mean the modular case or does
it mean any rpm?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux