On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 10:33 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Breaking updates would be pushed only at these times (unless there > > is a > > *really* good reason). This could involve also writing some release > > notes > > (e.g. the packager could tick a box "breaking update" and submit a > > note which > > is then added to the release notes). > > > > Currently EPEL is basically a "rolling release" distro which is > > probably the > > opposite of what RHEL/CentOS users are looking for. > > We have talked about doing this kind of thing in the past, but... > it's a > ton more work (you have to have releng folks do a bunch of work every > 3 > months or whatever) and we could never agree on the timing. Is it > just > randomly every 3 months? everytime a new RHEL minor is out? Every > time a > new CentOS minor is out? With the perspective of someone who has seen the described problem repeatedly as an EPEL contributor, does it really matter which one option is chosen? regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
