On 11/02/2017 11:03 AM, Peter Rex wrote: > Thanks for the info, Ricardo. Hadn't found the retirement notice. Security, > I guess. I can't resist saying, though, that I regret using Ansible and my > assumption that one of the Es in EPEL stood for Enterprise. Oh well, live > and learn. Sorry things didn't work out as you would have liked. ansible1.9 was always intended as a short term 'bridge' to help give folks more time to migrate to 2.0. When upstream stopped supporting it, we retired it in EPEL as well. ansible is very very fast moving and complex and there's no way we could backport even security fixes to an out of date 1.9 version. Sorry. You can of course still use 1.9 if you wish, just realize that it doesn't get any bugfixes or security updates. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
