On 25/04/2017 16:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 April 2017 at 04:28, Jean-Francois Dockes <jf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place. >> > > No this is as good as any. The package looks to be branched for EPEL > by pbonzini who I have cc'd on this. [They may have branched after > you sent this email or maybe a while before.. I don't know.] So it > looks like it is in progress of occurring I initially packaged recoll for EPEL6 as a favor to a colleague of mine that was using RHEL6 at the time. I have never upgraded the package to RHEL7, but I can do that if there is request. I've now requested creation of the EPEL7 branch. Thanks, Paolo >> I am the developper for Recoll, a full-text search application, which has >> been packaged for Fedora for a long time. >> >> I have a small but steady rivulet of users asking for CentOS or Enterprise >> Linux Recoll packages. In consequence, there are some CentOS 7 packages on >> the Recoll web site. It would be easier for the users and and for me if the >> Fedora package was maintained for EPEL instead. >> >> Any possibility that this could happen ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> J.F. Dockes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
