On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Jiří Konečný wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 09:25 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 01:17:11PM +0100, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5.11.2015 18:11, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 04:59:07PM +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > > > > > Visiting a spoke isn't the same as changing something. I think we > > > > should > > > > base this on changes, shouldn't we? > > > > > > > > > > But if you visit a spoke without changing something, it means the > > > defaults > > > are ok for you and you're probably not going to change them later. > > > > > > Maybe we could put both "visited" and "changed" to the file and let > > > Initial > > > Setup (and other) decide. > > > > The problem is we have no way to know what they intended if they > > haven't > > changed anything. Maybe they were just exploring? > > And what about some timeout? They must be in a spoke I don't know maybe > 5 seconds only then you set it as visited. I think when the user will > be 5 or more seconds he saw the settings and confirmed it even when > she/he doesn't changed it. I don't think that's a good idea, the user has no way to know that's happening. -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT) _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
