On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 01:17:11PM +0100, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > > > On 5.11.2015 18:11, Brian C. Lane wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 04:59:07PM +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > >Visiting a spoke isn't the same as changing something. I think we should > >base this on changes, shouldn't we? > > > > But if you visit a spoke without changing something, it means the defaults > are ok for you and you're probably not going to change them later. > > Maybe we could put both "visited" and "changed" to the file and let Initial > Setup (and other) decide. The problem is we have no way to know what they intended if they haven't changed anything. Maybe they were just exploring? -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT) _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list