On Sep 9, 2014, at 9:27 PM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Given the widespread mis-use of dual-boot to mean more than one, If by widespread you actually mean uncommon, then I agree. The word dual comes from a root word that means two. Any confusion on this point is made worse by using a prefix that doesn't mean two, but rather means many or much. > I was trying > to make the point that the written blocking language used needs to be > especially carefully crafted to ensure it *can't* be misinterpreted to mean > more than two. Right, hence dual boot. I understand in the context of booting, the programming/engineering vernacular is multiboot. But release criteria attempts to use plain language whenever possible, and multi-boot is less specific than dual-boot. Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list