Re: Anaconda threads and Yum with rpm backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  From the "make it somehow work for F18" POV I'd guess the easiest
>  thing
> would be doing it in anaconda: unlike rpm and yum, it doesn't have an
> API it needs to guarantee for its users, and (because of that) its
> need

Yeah, that is probably true...

> for transferring state across the fork border is also by far the
> smallest of the three. As its AFAICT not doing fine-grained
> per-package
> progress meter any more it might be "just" a matter of pushing
> package
> names along with the total progress across pipes or such.

oh, but we still have per package progress updates and error reporting with abort/continue dialogs in case anything bad happens..

Martin

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux