On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:48 +0100, Ales Kozumplik wrote: > On 01/24/2010 11:37 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Before the whole disk formatting changes MD BIOS RAID arrays used to have > > their own type of "partitionable mdarray". And we check for the normal > > "mdarray" type in various places (mostly to do with mdraid /boot handling where > > I'm seeing a traceback qtm), and when the type matches mdarray the code > > assumes a regular mdarray. This is getting out of hand. I'm starting to think that biosraid and containers need their own subclasses. Dave > > Wasn't there a legitimate to have 'partitionable mdarray' removed? > > Otherwise ACK from me. > > Ales > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
