Re: [PATCH 5/7] Make addUdevPartitionDevice add lvm filters for ignored partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:23 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01/22/2010 05:14 PM, David Lehman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 21:32 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> When we ignore a partition because its disk cannot be found, or
> >> des not have  a disklabel format, or is not partitionable, we should
> >> lvm to ignore the partition too.
> >> ---
> >>   storage/devicetree.py |    6 ++++++
> >>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/storage/devicetree.py b/storage/devicetree.py
> >> index 514e37b..e32fd95 100644
> >> --- a/storage/devicetree.py
> >> +++ b/storage/devicetree.py
> >> @@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ class DeviceTree(object):
> >>                   # if the current device is still not in
> >>                   # the tree, something has gone wrong
> >>                   log.error("failure scanning device %s" % disk_name)
> >> +                lvm.lvm_cc_addFilterRejectRegexp(name)
> >>                   return
> >>
> >
> > This one's fine, but...
> >
> >>           # Check that the disk has partitions. If it does not, we must have
> >> @@ -1084,6 +1085,11 @@ class DeviceTree(object):
> >>           # of, like logical volumes.
> >>           if not getattr(disk.format, "partitions", None) or \
> >>              not disk.partitionable:
> >> +            # When we got here because the disk does not have a disklabel
> >> +            # format (ie a biosraid member), or because it is not
> >> +            # partitionable we want LVM to ignore this partition too
> >> +            if disk.format.type != "disklabel" or not disk.partitionable:
> >> +                lvm.lvm_cc_addFilterRejectRegexp(name)
> >>               log.debug("ignoring partition %s" % name)
> >>               return
> >>
> >
> > You've changed the meaning of this conditional to suit your purposes. It
> > no longer accounts for the possibility that the partition is/was on a
> > disk that we've just reinitialized.
> >
> 
> No, note I added a sub if, the original if is still there. I added the sub
> if especially to account "for the possibility that the partition is/was on a
> disk that we've just reinitialized", because in this case we do not want
> to add it to the lvm filter.

Ok, good. This is what you get for heaving piles of patches at me before
I've had my coffee. Ack.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux