> you must also care of what users want. i see no reason to check the media > if everything works fine. and, imho, "everything works fine" should be the > default. "everything works fine" = download worked fine, burn worked fine, media was created fine. That's a whole lot of trust for us to give a process that's proven itself time and time again to break randomly. > it is also true that lately, more and more, the users who want to > see it working have to pass various options to grub, like selinux=0 and > nomodeset. Thse options should only be needed in the case where everything doesn't "work fine". For most users, they should not be required. If they are required, it's a sign that there's a bug that needs to be fixed. > i believe that the media check should be suggested when something > goes wrong, and not otherwise. Once something goes wrong, it's too late. Once something goes wrong, you now have a half-installed system. If we can detect problems before they crop up, why wouldn't we choose to do so? > not many users report bugs and forcing media check on all users will not > help with that. This does not follow. > yes, forcing media check will reduce a little bit the number of NOTAbugs, > but the price on fedora user base may be huge. Increasing the number of NOTABUGs means we spend more time dealing with bugzilla, and less time fixing real bugs. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
