Re: comps.xml needs A LOT MORE DOCUMENTATION

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:41:40PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> 
> Or you could do it. It's not that hard to reverse engineer a dtd based
> on comps.py and the example comps file.
> 
> So write one - it's probably an hour or so worth of work.

Or.... I and the company that I work for could pay Red Hat to do so... 
wait, we already did(!).

I'm not trying to be rude about it, but it isn't inappropriate for
features to be documented by the creators of those features.  Volunteers
are fine but that is not what I'm getting at.


--
Joshua Jensen <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx>
Work:  919 392 1488  Mobile: 919 454 9679  Fax: 919 392 7377
Pager: 866 264 2691  Epage: jjensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IBM Linux Architect - RHCE, RHCT, etc
"If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"



[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux