On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 07:41:15PM +0200, Alain TAUCH wrote: > you're kind of rude regarding what they did there... Its not rude, its "enterprise". I want features that I pay for to be documented. > if you consider you there should be an official up-to-date > documentation about anaconda regarding what you have paid to RedHat, > you should contact directly RedHat support with your contract > references. I shouldn't have to, but I will. Thanks for the suggestion. > You perfectly know that what you're looking for does not exist Yes, which is why I'm asking for it > and this is not the right place for asking this. The anaconda-devel-list isn't the right place to ask about anaconda and comps.xml documentation? > there are many volunteers around here, you can't just disregard their work, > we owe you nothing. I'm not claiming that you do. I'm claiming that Red Hat should document their own work. -- Joshua Jensen <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx> Work: 919 392 1488 Mobile: 919 454 9679 Fax: 919 392 7377 Pager: 866 264 2691 Epage: jjensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IBM Linux Architect - RHCE, RHCT, etc "If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"
