Re: comps.xml needs a lot more documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:01:49 -0400
Joshua Jensen [Joshua] wrote:

Joshua> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:18:54AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Joshua> > 
Joshua> > For basearchonly see:                                                                    
Joshua> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-January/msg01214.html
Joshua> 
Joshua> Already been there... this is FAR from official documentation of what 
Joshua> this and other comps.xml directives are doing.
Joshua> 
Joshua> > Check out 
Joshua> > http://rau.homedns.org/twiki/bin/view/Anaconda/AnacondaDocumentationProject 
Joshua> > - while it doesn't cover everything it has lots of good information..
Joshua> 
Joshua> Already seen this... this doesn't cover either directive I asked 
Joshua> about... nor is it official, nor does it provide a DTD.

you're kind of rude regarding what they did there...

if you consider you there should be an official up-to-date documentation about
anaconda regarding what you have paid to RedHat, you should contact directly 
RedHat support with your contract references. You perfectly know that what you're 
looking for does not exist, and this is not the right place for asking this.

there are many volunteers around here, you can't just disregard their work,
we owe you nothing.

-- 
Alain TAUCH

please, reply only to the list.



[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux