Re: comps.xml needs A LOT MORE DOCUMENTATION

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 17:04, Joshua Jensen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:41:40PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > 
> > Or you could do it. It's not that hard to reverse engineer a dtd based
> > on comps.py and the example comps file.
> > 
> > So write one - it's probably an hour or so worth of work.
> 
> Or.... I and the company that I work for could pay Red Hat to do so... 
> wait, we already did(!).
> 
> I'm not trying to be rude about it, but it isn't inappropriate for
> features to be documented by the creators of those features.  Volunteers
> are fine but that is not what I'm getting at.

Then you're asking on the wrong list. This is not Enterprise support
list nor is it the 'red hat whiners' list. This is anaconda-devel. So if
you're interested in hearing about or adding to the development process
then you're in the right place. However, if you're interested in
bitching and moaning about what things you did or did not pay for - I
think this is definitely the wrong place.

Call your support rep and complain about it - if your company paid all
this money then I'm certain they know who their rep is.

-sv




[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux