Ok, I've figured one more step out, which confuses me even further. On FC1, with a default NFS mount (copying all the CDs into 1 directory, then exporting it), I get "That directory does not seem to contain a anaconda installation tree." On a whim, I tried adding a RedHat directory in there.. (both renaming Fedora to RedHat as well as just ln -s). After that, I get "The anaconda installation tree in that directory does not seem to match your boot media." Ideas? On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 10:46, Jeremy Huber wrote: > If this is the wrong arena to ask this, sorry.. I'll take it elsewhere. > > I've attempting to get either RH9 or Fedora Core 1 loaded onto a Cobalt > RaQ3, which I realize is unsupported. I've gotten RedHat 8 on, but it seems > that whatever changes were made to the installer at RH9 have confounded me. > I also don't know if my problem lies with the installer or with the boot > kernel itself. I can get both RH9 and Fedora to the point where it asks for > the installation type. No matter which type of network installation I > choose, it says that it cannot find an installation there. (Even though I > can FTP in, NFS mount, etc and it works fine for normal installations). > Looking at the logs, it's even successfully making the FTP or NFS > connection, but doesn't think it's right. Any ideas if I'm missing some > kernel modules, or if it's the installer? > > TIA, > Jeremy > > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
