Re: I think that the current state of ALSA is poor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:15:05AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> wempwer@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Today, I was able to reproduce a situation with `arecord' not
> > recording any sound without giving a device name explicitly.
> >
> > $ arecord -v -f dat -d 3 test.wav
> > Recording WAVE 'test.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz, Stereo
> > Plug PCM: Linear conversion PCM (S32_LE)
> > ...
> > Slave: Soft volume PCM
> > Control: Digital Capture Volume
> > ...
> > Slave: Direct Snoop PCM
> > ...
> > Hardware PCM card 0 'HDA ATI SB' device 0 subdevice 0
> > ...
> >
> > The above does not produce any sound. In contrary, this does:
> >
> > $ arecord -v -f dat -d 3 test.wav -D hw:0,0
> > Recording WAVE 'test.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz, Stereo
> > Hardware PCM card 0 'HDA ATI SB' device 0 subdevice 0
> > ...
> >
> > These outputs are verry different.
> 
> The only relevant differnece is the Soft volume plugin.
> Check the value of the "Digital" mixer control.

You are right. When Digital control is set to 0 then arecord doesn't
work with giving a device name explicitly. Does it look like a bug?
 
-- 
<wempwer@xxxxxxxxx>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux