2008/1/1, Erik Slagter <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > John Haxby wrote: > > > I've lost the bit where you said about you're against putting an > > "unmatured[sic] system in a distro". Fedora is a proving ground for > > relatively immature systems -- compiz and beryl are a good example: if > > you want a guaranteed stable distro pick up RHEL or CentOS. > > Seconded. Fedora is comparable to debian unstable, which I happen to > like very much, but for unexperienced users it may not be ehrm... an > optimal experience ;-) So maybe then don't advertise it as very useful for common Linux desktop user? :) Just suggestion. And my gripe is not about Fedora, which has releases rather frequently, and don't have LTS. However, Ubuntu guys are very convinced to include PA in Hardy. I don't think I can easily agree with that. Just my two cents in 1st January, Peter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
