Re: dsctl healthcheck bug - or bad at least a bad resolution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Something to note, as I just triggered this bug on a replica I built today, this is a new bug.

I have 2 pretty much identical consumer only replicas. The bug triggers 56 times on the new one and not the old one. The replica is a consumer only, and not a hub. Same ldif file (for db and suffix) to make like 9 of these boxes, this health check happens only on the new ones.

Old box version:

1.4.3.8-6
389-ds-base python3-lib389 389-ds-base-libs

New box version:

1.4.3.22

Trying to downgrade the box.. bah cant start 389 after the downgrade lol. Rebuilding.

1.4.3.8-7 downgrade (dont see any in between version from 1.4.3.8-7 to 1.4.3.22) .. Ok and downgrading helped! the dsctl healthcheck works!

Hope this helps,

Gary



On 4/15/21 2:39 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:

On 4/15/21 4:23 PM, Gary Waters wrote:

These entries look fine.  I'm assuming you are running this on a hub or consumer, is that correct? Does it work correctly on the supplier replica?  I think the "nsslapd-state=referral on update" might be tripping up the healthcheck.

Yes I am using this as a hub. The same ldif I use to make the suffix I use to make the suppliers and consumers, and they work fine (and dsctl healthcheck says they are ok).  The setting of nsslapd-state was set by the dsconf command I sent before. I checked a production hub I have (which this one will eventually replace), and that is the correct setting.

Perhaps this is an issue with dsctl's healthcheck then.

There is definitely a bug, I was just trying to narrow it down. I'll try and look into this tomorrow...


-Gary


_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux