On 4/15/21 4:23 PM, Gary Waters wrote:
These entries look fine. I'm assuming you are running this on a hub
or consumer, is that correct? Does it work correctly on the supplier
replica? I think the "nsslapd-state=referral on update" might be
tripping up the healthcheck.
Yes I am using this as a hub. The same ldif I use to make the suffix I
use to make the suppliers and consumers, and they work fine (and dsctl
healthcheck says they are ok). The setting of nsslapd-state was set
by the dsconf command I sent before. I checked a production hub I have
(which this one will eventually replace), and that is the correct
setting.
Perhaps this is an issue with dsctl's healthcheck then.
There is definitely a bug, I was just trying to narrow it down. I'll try
and look into this tomorrow...
-Gary
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
