These entries look fine. I'm assuming you are running this on a hub or consumer, is that correct? Does it work correctly on the supplier replica? I think the "nsslapd-state=referral on update" might be tripping up the healthcheck.
Yes I am using this as a hub. The same ldif I use to make the suffix I use to make the suppliers and consumers, and they work fine (and dsctl healthcheck says they are ok). The setting of nsslapd-state was set by the dsconf command I sent before. I checked a production hub I have (which this one will eventually replace), and that is the correct setting.
Perhaps this is an issue with dsctl's healthcheck then. -Gary _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
