On May 23, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: But based on what you say later in the post, it's not unbounded, it's just not bounded by what you set as the cache size?
Yes. I guess unbounded was the wrong word now that the ratio of the boundary seems to be shown. The boundary of the memory growth seems to be (6 * cachememsize).
It doesn't grow unless it gets hit with ldapmodify operations. It seems to correctly use the cachememsize and the dbcachesize when reading in all entries and doesn't grow if just hit with ldapsearch.
Yes, please.
Ok.
Russ.
Thanks, Russ. ==============================
Russell Beall
Programmer Analyst IV Enterprise Identity Management University of Southern California On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: The thing in common is this - when the cache usage hits the cache max size, you see unbounded memory growth.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
|
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
