On 04/18/2012 12:10 PM, Russell Beall wrote:
Does anybody have a pointer to any performance
comparisons between Sun DS and 389?
I was extremely happy with the performance boost using 389 on
a Linux VM which is 5-8 times faster for ldapsearch operations
than the older Sun machines with Sun DS 6.3.
Please note that earlier versions of the SunDS EULA forbade the
publishing of competitive benchmark figures.
In testing one of our most important use cases just now, I
find that the ldapmodify speed is many many times slower. This
doesn't make much sense, so I think I'm doing something wrong or
having something misconfigured.
Earlier
You mean, with SunDS? On Linux or Solaris?
I improved the write performance by using large db cache
sizes and moving the nsslapd-db-home-directory to tmpfs. Now
most modify operations have very little I/O wait except when
occasionally flushing the index files and such, and yet, there
is a CPU pegged for very long periods of time, orders of
magnitude higher than on Sun DS.
Is there any documentation on ldapmodify performance that I
could review? Google searching seems eerily silent on the
issue… (which also leads me to believe I have something
misconfigured if nobody has been asking about the issue…)
The particular use case I am working with involves replacing
large quantities of uniqueMember values on entries in ou=groups.
Yeah, this particular operation has not been optimized. I believe
SunDS added explicit optimizations for this particular case.
Thanks,
Russ.
==============================
Russell Beall
Programmer Analyst IV
Enterprise Identity
Management
University of Southern
California
==============================
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
|
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
