On 04/03/2012 08:22 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
Hi Rich,
firstly, thanks again for your time and for your support!
I'll file bugs on trac, right?
right
https://fedorahosted.org/389
Rich Megginson<rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Right, although note that schema replication is single master. You
should choose a master to make it the "primary" master for schema updates.
* are there any issues to let 389 create/modify custom schema files instead of
putting everything in 99user.ldif?
I mean something like:
# ldapmodify -v
dn: cn=schema
changetype: modify
schemafile: 60example.ldif
add: attributetypes
attributetypes: ( 1.2.3.4.5.6.1 NAME 'dateofbirth' DESC 'For employee
birthdays' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUED X-ORIGIN
'Example defined')
* did you experience any issue using schema replication in "primary" master
mode (eg. decreased manageability, lack of tracking of schema files,...)?
It's a trade off - it's easier to manage your custom schema if you have
your own separate schema file, but then you have to replicate it
yourself with puppet/cfengine or something like that. If you use LDAP
to manage your schema, it gets replicated, but it is harder to manage.
Thx+Peace,
R:
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
