Brodie, Kent wrote: > Whoops. I did the wrong line with the enablerepo part. :-) > > (No matter, this was on our testing platform only). > That's fine. In fact that's very good news. Thanks for doing this. What platform are you running? > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich > Megginson > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:41 PM > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > Subject: Re: [389-users] *Big* thank you for developers > > Brodie, Kent wrote: > >> The yum update defaults to the latest, 1.2.3. >> >> > hmm - it's not supposed to - 1.2.3 is only in the testing repository, > which is not enabled by default - what platform are you running? > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091022/4c21f002/attachment.bin
