Brodie, Kent wrote: > The yum update defaults to the latest, 1.2.3. > hmm - it's not supposed to - 1.2.3 is only in the testing repository, which is not enabled by default - what platform are you running? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich > Megginson > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:30 PM > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > Subject: Re: [389-users] *Big* thank you for developers > > Brodie, Kent wrote: > >> Previous setup: Fedora directory server 1.2.0. ssl, replication all >> running. >> >> Current setup: 389 dir server, $latest. >> >> I cannot state enough how pleased I am with the upgrade. The >> instructions on the web page were flawless, the update was frankly, >> probably the simplest thing I've done this week on a software package >> system that's the most complex and critical of what I currently >> manage. I half expected SOME hiccups, errors, or things out of sync, >> or broken replication, or SOMETHING... and so on. Instead-- it just >> > went > >> flawlessly. >> >> Awesome. Absolutely awesome. >> >> Keep up the good work. >> >> > Thanks! > > By $latest did you mean 1.2.2 or 1.2.3? > >> --Kent C. Brodie, Medical College of Wisconsin >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091022/f5da0950/attachment.bin
