Brodie, Kent wrote: > > Previous setup: Fedora directory server 1.2.0. ssl, replication all > running. > > Current setup: 389 dir server, $latest. > > I cannot state enough how pleased I am with the upgrade. The > instructions on the web page were flawless, the update was frankly, > probably the simplest thing I?ve done this week on a software package > system that?s the most complex and critical of what I currently > manage. I half expected SOME hiccups, errors, or things out of sync, > or broken replication, or SOMETHING? and so on. Instead-- it just went > flawlessly. > > Awesome. Absolutely awesome. > > Keep up the good work. > Thanks! By $latest did you mean 1.2.2 or 1.2.3? > > --Kent C. Brodie, Medical College of Wisconsin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091022/008e720c/attachment.bin
