[389-users] Chaining and LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roberto Polli wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I got similar problem with: dblink+proxyuser.
>
>   
>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>     
>>> Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
>>> Bu if i try to execute the ldapserach in first directory server i have the
>>> following error: proxy does not currently work with directory manager.
>>> Directory manager is considered a "local" user to each directory server.
>>> Try a different user. Now, i create a new user in first DS:
>>>       
>
>   
>> By first DS do you mean the DS with the "real" database or the DS with the
>> database link? We also refer to the DS with the "real" database as the
>> "remote" DS and the DS with the database link as the "local" DS.
>>     
>
> case1)
> * I bind with uid=admin to the local DS tree to modify the "givenName" of a 
> user on the remote server
> * the modify is successful, as the uid=admin is proxied and the "uid=admin" is 
> replicated on the remote server 
>
> case2)
> * same as case1 but I try to modify "userPassword"
> * the modify fails as the remote server won't evaluate aci on "uid=admin" but 
> on "dn:proxyuser"
>   
Is there an aci on the remote server that explicitly denies access to 
userPassword?  How about on the local server?
>   
>> Did you add an ACI to allow the uid=ttestuser,cn=config to add entries under
>> node=testgio,dc=example,dc=com ?
>>     
> to solve that issue it seems by this thread that you suggest giving 
> (proxy+all) access to proxyuser instead of the proxied one (uid=admin)
>
> imho this won't fit, as every proxied user will be granted write access; while 
> the desired behaviour is to have the aci checked against uid=admin 
>
> Am I wrong?
>   
You should not have to allow the proxy user "all" access, only "proxy" 
access.  The proxy user is not a "superuser".  The access control should 
apply to the actual user.
> Peace,
> R.
>
>
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090723/6a63d0f2/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux