hi all, I got similar problem with: dblink+proxyuser. >Rich Megginson wrote: >>Giovanni Mancuso wrote: >>Bu if i try to execute the ldapserach in first directory server i have the >> following error: proxy does not currently work with directory manager. >> Directory manager is considered a "local" user to each directory server. >> Try a different user. Now, i create a new user in first DS: >By first DS do you mean the DS with the "real" database or the DS with the > database link? We also refer to the DS with the "real" database as the > "remote" DS and the DS with the database link as the "local" DS. case1) * I bind with uid=admin to the local DS tree to modify the "givenName" of a user on the remote server * the modify is successful, as the uid=admin is proxied and the "uid=admin" is replicated on the remote server case2) * same as case1 but I try to modify "userPassword" * the modify fails as the remote server won't evaluate aci on "uid=admin" but on "dn:proxyuser" >Did you add an ACI to allow the uid=ttestuser,cn=config to add entries under > node=testgio,dc=example,dc=com ? to solve that issue it seems by this thread that you suggest giving (proxy+all) access to proxyuser instead of the proxied one (uid=admin) imho this won't fit, as every proxied user will be granted write access; while the desired behaviour is to have the aci checked against uid=admin Am I wrong? Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it Tel. +39.06.91801075 - fax +39.06.91612446 Tel. cel +39.340.6522736 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma) "Il seguente messaggio contiene informazioni riservate. Qualora questo messaggio fosse da Voi ricevuto per errore, Vogliate cortesemente darcene notizia a mezzo e-mail. Vi sollecitiamo altres? a distruggere il messaggio erroneamente ricevuto. Quanto precede Vi viene chiesto ai fini del rispetto della legge in materia di protezione dei dati personali."
