Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Rich, > > nsslapd-lastmod is not set, which means it is turned on. I assume that > you would the timestamps anyway, if you have replicated environment. > > Are you going to open a bug, or should I do it? > Go ahead and open a bug for this. Thanks! > -Reinhard > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich > Megginson > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:08 PM > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. > Subject: Re: Warning with vlvindex.... > > Reinhard Nappert wrote: > >> Rich, I have just the suffix entry in the directory at this point. I >> load this ldif script during setup: >> This seems to be fine: >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers finished; >> cleaning up... >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up. >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Cleaning up producer >> thread... >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Indexing complete. >> Post-process >> ing... >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - Nothing to do to build ancestorid index >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Flushing caches... >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Closing files... >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - All database threads now stopped >> [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete. >> Processed 1 en >> tries in 0 seconds. (inf entries/sec) >> >> Afterwards, I do my vlvindex on the timestamps. I guess that the >> import does not set createTimestamp and this is why I get the warning. >> >> What do you think? >> >> > Sounds like at least two bugs > 1) createTimestamp should be present, unless you have nsslapd-lastmod > turned off. > 2) vlvindex should not give an error message - either its a real error > (not sure why) or the error message is spurious and should not be > printed by default > >> -Reinhard >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich >> Megginson >> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:32 PM >> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >> Subject: Re: Warning with vlvindex.... >> >> Reinhard Nappert wrote: >> >> >>> Rich, >>> >>> It seems to work. I will load a couple of thousands entries and do >>> some tests.... >>> >>> >>> >> Was the database empty when you ran vlvindex? If not, what was in it? >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >>> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich >>> Megginson >>> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:46 PM >>> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>> Subject: Re: Warning with vlvindex.... >>> >>> Reinhard Nappert wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I built FDS 1.1.2 from scratch and installed and configured it. I >>>> get >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> the following warning, when I run a vlvindex. This used to run in >>>> any >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> 1.0.x and 1.1.0 release. >>>> >>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - warning: ancestorid not indexed on 1 >>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: WARNING: Failed to fetch >>>> subtree lists: (-30990) DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair >>>> found >>>> >>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Possibly the entrydn or >>>> ancestorid index is corrupted or does not exist. >>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Attempting brute-force >>>> method >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> instead. >>>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Finished indexing. >>>> >>>> Dows anybody has an idea? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Was the database empty when you started? It looks as though it >>> completed - does the vlv index work? >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Reinhard >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> - >>>> - >>>> -- >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080919/34b7f835/attachment.bin
