Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Rich, I have just the suffix entry in the directory at this point. I > load this ldif script during setup: > This seems to be fine: > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers finished; > cleaning up... > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up. > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Cleaning up producer > thread... > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Indexing complete. > Post-process > ing... > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - Nothing to do to build ancestorid index > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Flushing caches... > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Closing files... > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - All database threads now stopped > [18/Sep/2008:13:02:53 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete. > Processed 1 en > tries in 0 seconds. (inf entries/sec) > > Afterwards, I do my vlvindex on the timestamps. I guess that the import > does not set createTimestamp and this is why I get the warning. > > What do you think? > Sounds like at least two bugs 1) createTimestamp should be present, unless you have nsslapd-lastmod turned off. 2) vlvindex should not give an error message - either its a real error (not sure why) or the error message is spurious and should not be printed by default > -Reinhard > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich > Megginson > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:32 PM > To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. > Subject: Re: Warning with vlvindex.... > > Reinhard Nappert wrote: > >> Rich, >> >> It seems to work. I will load a couple of thousands entries and do >> some tests.... >> >> > Was the database empty when you ran vlvindex? If not, what was in it? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com >> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Rich >> Megginson >> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:46 PM >> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >> Subject: Re: Warning with vlvindex.... >> >> Reinhard Nappert wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I built FDS 1.1.2 from scratch and installed and configured it. I get >>> > > >>> the following warning, when I run a vlvindex. This used to run in any >>> > > >>> 1.0.x and 1.1.0 release. >>> >>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - warning: ancestorid not indexed on 1 >>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: WARNING: Failed to fetch >>> subtree lists: (-30990) DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found >>> >>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Possibly the entrydn or >>> ancestorid index is corrupted or does not exist. >>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Attempting brute-force >>> method >>> >>> >> >> >>> instead. >>> [18/Sep/2008:12:20:18 -0400] - userRoot: Finished indexing. >>> >>> Dows anybody has an idea? >>> >>> >>> >> Was the database empty when you started? It looks as though it >> completed - does the vlv index work? >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> -Reinhard >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> -- >>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080918/8b94a3ea/attachment.bin
