Rich Megginson wrote: > Ken Marsh wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have some questions upgrading 3 Red Hat systems (ES3, 4 x86 & >> ES5x86_64, one each) from FDS 1.01-4 to 1.1. >> >> 1. On RHES5.1 x86_64, is it safe to do yum to update the >> installation? There are a lot of warnings out there about yum vs >> Beta of 1.1. Should I remove all of 1.01-4 first? >> > Either way is fine. Just be sure to backup your data (db2bak, db2ldif) > and your config (slapd-instance/config) before you upgrade. >> >> 1. >> >> >> 2. Should I be using redhat-ds instead of fedora-ds for supported >> RH systems? >> > Red Hat Directory Server is not free - you have to purchase a separate > subscription/entitlement. If you would like to purchase Red Hat DS, > please contact me off list. >> >> 1. >> >> >> 2. Searching for packages in rhn.redhat.com, there is no redhat-ds >> available. Shouldn?t it be there? I have entitlements for 3, 4 >> and 5. >> > See above. >> >> 1. >> >> >> 2. Must I use YUM for Enterprise 4 systems? Why can?t I just >> download an FDS 1.1 RPM and install it? >> > There is no FDS 1.1 RPM for EL4. As an aside, up2date supports yum repos to some extent. If you look in /etc/sysconfig/sources (I think) you'll see some syntax for it. rob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080310/c4e2087a/attachment.bin
