Ken Marsh wrote: > > Hi, > > I have some questions upgrading 3 Red Hat systems (ES3, 4 x86 & > ES5x86_64, one each) from FDS 1.01-4 to 1.1. > > 1. On RHES5.1 x86_64, is it safe to do yum to update the > installation? There are a lot of warnings out there about yum vs > Beta of 1.1. Should I remove all of 1.01-4 first? > Either way is fine. Just be sure to backup your data (db2bak, db2ldif) and your config (slapd-instance/config) before you upgrade. > > 1. > > > 2. Should I be using redhat-ds instead of fedora-ds for supported > RH systems? > Red Hat Directory Server is not free - you have to purchase a separate subscription/entitlement. If you would like to purchase Red Hat DS, please contact me off list. > > 1. > > > 2. Searching for packages in rhn.redhat.com, there is no redhat-ds > available. Shouldn?t it be there? I have entitlements for 3, 4 > and 5. > See above. > > 1. > > > 2. Must I use YUM for Enterprise 4 systems? Why can?t I just > download an FDS 1.1 RPM and install it? > There is no FDS 1.1 RPM for EL4. > > 1. It would be much easier than converting E4 systems to YUM. > 2. If I must use YUM, is there some EASY, STRAIGHTFORWARD > instructions for installing YUM on ES4? Everything out there > seems to assume I am setting up some grand upgrade > redistribution engine when all I want is a few packages. > > 1. > > > > Ken Marsh > > ANS System Administration Lead > > (410) 876-9200 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080310/46d6f057/attachment.bin
